Department of Labor (DoL) to standardize reporting of occupational statistics based on objective ratings of diverse job requirement and work characteristics across the labor force. One way to address these limitations is to use a conceptual scheme to classify military occupations into a small number of categories using objective ratings of job conditions based on the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) system. 13, 14 A limitation of these military occupational studies is that the denominator population is too small to generate stable outcome estimates for most individual occupations, whereas broadly defined occupational groups, such as two-digit Department of Defense-wide occupation codes, are not designed to define a meaningful dimension in predicting a diverse range of outcomes. 9Īlthough few comparable studies have been carried out in the military, research has documented significant differences across military occupations in rates of job satisfaction, 10 injury, 11 disability, 12 and suicide. 1 These studies have documented such things as low rates of job satisfaction among workers with jobs featuring a combination of high demands and low autonomy, 4, 5 low work performance among workers exposed to high-intensity artificial lighting, 6 high rates of hypertension among emergency respondents, 7, 8 and high rates of suicide among farmers. A long tradition of research in organizational psychology and related disciplines has examined occupational differences in worker’s health, 1, 2 job satisfaction, 1, 3 and work performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |